<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>F. Harper</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>D. Raban</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>S. Rafaeli</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>J. Konstan</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2008</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;Question and answer (Q&amp;amp;A) sites such as Yahoo! Answers are places where users ask questions and others answer them. In this paper, we investigate predictors of answer quality through a comparative, controlled field study of responses provided across several online Q&amp;amp;A sites. Along with several quantitative results concerning the effects of factors such as question topic and rhetorical strategy, we present two high-level messages. First, you get what you pay for in Q&amp;amp;A sites. Answer quality was typically higher in Google Answers (a fee-based site) than in the free sites we studied, and paying more money for an answer led to better outcomes. Second, we find that a Q&amp;amp;A site&acirc;€™s community of users contributes to its success. Yahoo! Answers, a Q&amp;amp;A site where anybody can answer questions, outperformed sites that depend on specific individuals to answer questions, such as library reference services.&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
	<URL>http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357191</URL>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>
