<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Harper, F. Maxwell</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Moy, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Konstan, J.A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2009</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Facts or Friends? Distinguishing Informational and Conversational Questions in Social Q&A Sites</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;Tens of thousands of questions are asked and answered&lt;br /&gt;every day on social question and answer (Q&amp;amp;A) Web sites&lt;br /&gt;such as Yahoo Answers. While these sites generate an&lt;br /&gt;enormous volume of searchable data, the problem of&lt;br /&gt;determining which questions and answers are archival&lt;br /&gt;quality has grown. One major component of this problem is&lt;br /&gt;the prevalence of conversational questions, identified both&lt;br /&gt;by Q&amp;amp;A sites and academic literature as questions that are&lt;br /&gt;intended simply to start discussion. For example, a&lt;br /&gt;conversational question such as &acirc;€œdo you believe in&lt;br /&gt;evolution?&acirc;€ might successfully engage users in discussion,&lt;br /&gt;but probably will not yield a useful web page for users&lt;br /&gt;searching for information about evolution. Using data from&lt;br /&gt;three popular Q&amp;amp;A sites, we confirm that humans can&lt;br /&gt;reliably distinguish between these conversational questions&lt;br /&gt;and other&Acirc;&nbsp; informational questions, and present evidence&lt;br /&gt;that conversational questions typically have much lower&lt;br /&gt;potential archival value than informational questions.&lt;br /&gt;Further, we explore the use of machine learning techniques&lt;br /&gt;to automatically classify questions as conversational or&lt;br /&gt;informational, learning in the process about categorical,&lt;br /&gt;linguistic, and social differences between different question&lt;br /&gt;types. Our algorithms approach human performance,&lt;br /&gt;attaining 89.7% classification accuracy in our experiments.&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>
