<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Panciera, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Halfaker, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Terveen, L.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2009</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>ACM 2009 International Conference on Group Work</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Sanibel Island, FL</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Association for Computing Machinery</PUBLISHER>
	<PAGES>51-60</PAGES>
	<DATE>05/10/2009</DATE>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>computer-supported</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>cooperative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>work,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>web-based</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>interaction</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;Open content web sites depend on users to produce information of value. Wikipedia is the largest and most well-known such site. Previous work has shown that a small fraction of editors &acirc; Wikipedians &acirc; do most of the work and produce most of the value. Other work has o&iuml;&not;ered conjectures about how Wikipedians differ from other editors and how Wikipedians change over time. We quantify and test these conjectures. Our key findings include: Wikipedians' edits last longer; Wikipedians invoke community norms more often to justify their edits; on many dimensions of activity, Wikipedians start intensely, tail off a little, then maintain a relatively high level of activity over the course of their career. Finally, we show that the amount of work done by Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians differs significantly from their very first day. Our results suggest a design opportunity: customizing the initial user experience to improve retention and channel new users' intense energy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>
