Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia
Publication Type  Conference Paper
Year of Publication  2007
Authors  Priedhorsky, R.; Chen, J.; Lam, S.K.; Panciera, K.; Terveen, L.; Riedl, J.
Conference Name  Conference on Supporting Group Work
Abstract  

Wikipedia’s brilliance and curse is that any user can edit any of the encyclopedia entries. We introduce the notion of the impact of an edit, measured by the number of times the edited version is viewed. Using several datasets, including recent logs of all article views, we show that frequent editors dominate what people see when they visit Wikipedia, and that this domination is increasing. Similarly, using the same impact measure, we show that the probability of a typical article view being damaged is small but increasing,
and we present empirically grounded classes of damage. Finally, we make policy recommendations for Wikipedia and other wikis in light of these findings.

URL  http://www.cs.umn.edu/~reid/papers/group282-priedhorsky.pdf
Export  Tagged XML BibTex

Wikipedia

Wikipedia isn't democratic. Only a few editors and some heavy users rule the whole site. But if you see the crap that many users write I sometimes think: It's ok so.

Wikipedia

sometimes really sucks. But you're right - editors are necessary.